Base - Boards And Surf Equipment
You need to upgrade your Flash Player to view this website correctly.
Simon BoardsDarren Handley DesignsBourton ShapesSparrow Shapes

 

base-logo
Copyright © 2006

BASE Contact

P (61) 7 5507 7600
F (61) 7 5593 5650

Send An Email

ABN 97 104 513 653

Muzza's Trippin' - THE NEW 5 FIN BONZA

 

Bourton LogoBy Murray Bourton

 

TRIPPUN FISH

The Purpose of The BONZA

The idea here is to modernize the old Campbell Bros Bonza design so that it could match the performance of today’s high performance boards.

Board Specifications

DIMENSIONS: 6.0 X 12 X 19 X 14 _ X 2 _ Diamond bat tail

Muzza's Ramblings

The original bonza was a tri fin concept sporting 2 long low profile keel fins on the rail punctuated by a deep single fin in the centre further back toward the tail. These fins were sitting over a deep double concave put there to create lift and forward speed.

Firstly the general rocker and profile of this new bonza is totally modern so it is going to be more manoeuvrable than its older counterpart simply for that reason. Since I have ironed out the bugs on my quad designs and understand the correct fin positions it was prudent to me to use two sets of small fins rather than a long stiffish keel as was used in the past.

TRIPPUN FISH Tail

Thankfully FCS came up with exactly what I had in mind which was a quad set of mini keels in two sizes of which I placed the larger set forward to get maximum rail bight up front. Remembering the forward rail bight would not be a deep as a normal thruster as the front fins on a thruster are a lot deeper than this keel so the feel I am hoping to achieve is a front fin that is less decisive and in fact one that will release with less persuasion so that most of the directing will be left to the dominating centre fin which is further forward than a normal thruster tail fin but would be in turn supported by the two rear smaller keels which are positioned more or less adjacent to the centre fin.

TRIPPUN FISH

Complicating matters even more is the extremely deep 6ml double concave through the whole finned area which is designed to lift the tail up and make the board flighty in the tail particularly because of the shallow depth of the keels. To minimize cavitation or sudden tail sliding I have built this deep double concave into a 3ml vee to help reduce the pressure on the shallow fins. The centre fin I chose was the Future Hatchet fin for the reason that it had a narrow base as I think all the area in the base of the 4 quad keels was more than enough to keep the board driving forward. All in all the centre fin will be the focus on direction change and to how much power is applied in this endeavour, so it will be critical the depth and position of this fin

Prediction

I am not too clued in to what the Campbell bros were trying to achieve with this design to be honest but I am clear on my purpose for this design. Rather than feeling the decisiveness of the larger front finned thruster design which tends to pull the rail in deeply I am hoping there maybe merit in a dominant single fin feel with all it’s little helpers (the other fins) that will keep the board running in and out of turns so there should be no loss of speed as there would be had the design be just a single fin. My prediction is when I get this design wired we may have a board that can be stabbed harder on rail at higher speeds without too much rail being dragged in making the manoeuvre less precarious . A lot of pros do a few little stall turns when they hit the bottom too fast so they do not spin out or catch a rail. It would be good to lay it over at higher speeds but I fear the double concave may be too deep for more powerful waves but up to 4 feet I think this design will be comfortable.

Results

Well this design certainly caused a stir! A few captions were lifted out and thrown on the Surfer Magazine’s chat forum where I was ripped into by vigilant Campbell Bros supporters for being an impostor and design thief. Being clearly misunderstood I just let it go straight over my head and have moved on. The design itself had a mixed reaction but there was a consensus to it lifting and sliding and being too twitchy. I think the double concave was too extreme and my rear fin selection needed work. Anyway due to the roasting I copped I do not have the will to follow through with the experiment to be honest, too many fins, too many variations and too much politics.Top

 

Back to Bourton Shapes Home Page | To talk to Murray Bourton about your new Bourton shape click here to send him an email.